RBHS Clarion

 

 

HOME

NEWS

FEATURES

OPINION

A&E

SPORTS

BLOGS

MEDIA

NEWS
Last updated on 11-26-08 @ 6:55 p.m.
Frozen mice cloned, mammoths possibly next

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
●Japanese scientists cloned mice that have been frozen for many years
●They used classic nuclear transfer technique
●Scientists may be able to clone other extinct animals frozen in ice
●Statements from biology teacher
Kellie Dean

Japanese scientists were able to clone mice that had been frozen for at least sixteen years.  Now these scientists think they may be able to do the same to bring back other extinct animals.  Mammoths would work best because there have been many of them found preserved in ice. 

Teruhiko Wakayama, the scientist who cloned the mice, was able to clone them even though their cells had burst.  So, they should be able to also clone extinct animals that have been conserved in ice for a longer period of time. 

Wakayama used the classic nuclear transfer technique.  This is when the nucleus of a cell, other than a germ cell, is removed and put into an unfertilized egg that has had its nucleus taken out.  The egg divides and then becomes an embryo.  The embryo is placed in a surrogate mother and begins to develop.

When Wakayama and the other scientists who worked with him cloned the mice, they used cells from the brain because they found that those cells worked best.  This was surprising because there has never been a mouse cloned using a brain cell before.

Cloning has been a controversial topic.  It is very expensive and more than 90% of the time it does not work when attempted.  Animals that have been cloned are more likely to get disorders and other illnesses.  They also usually die early. 

Biology teacher Kellie Dean said, “Although there are ethical concerns (mostly stemming from different religious views) about cloning, in particular - human cloning, there are potential benefits to cloning as well.” 

These benefits are farmers being able to produce better crops and raise animals that give us better products, such as cows that give better quality milk and chickens that give better quality eggs.

“I would also agree that cloning extinct animals could benefit scientists and researchers. However…clones have identical DNA, but not necessarily the same personality, because much of who you are comes from your past experiences and how you were raised,” said Dean.

--Submitted by Lauren Gestes, Staff Reporter

 

BARK @ US

What is your view on cloning?

FRESHMAN

Photopinion Image

"It's good for research and learning, but bad because it can harm animals.."

--Nina Pellizzari

SOPHOMORE

Photopinion Image

"I don't thnk its right and I'm against it."

--Mia Gomez

JUNIOR

Photopinion Image

"Sure, I'm for it."

--Mark Benya

SENIOR

Photopinion Image

"I'm in the middle. Its good for organ donations, but harmful on animals."

--Erin Claywell

 

Riverside Brookfield High School ● 160 Ridgewood Road ● Riverside, Illinois ● 60546 ● (708) 442-7500